Mong dans
N30 No. 2673
Governor No.
July 30
Date
1873 Feby 11
Last previous Paper.
1626
(Subject.)
DESPATCH.
RECEIVED
Chinese Passengers' Act 1855:
Transmits Return
of
20 MAR 1873
of length of Voyages of Steamers running
between Hong Kong & Singapore
(Minutes.)
K
191
7. The question raised by Mr. Messrs Witter is whether the fact that the P. & O. Boats make the voyage between Hong Kong & Singapore in less than seven days on an average ought to exempt them from the provisions of the Passengers Act - I am clearly of opinion that it ought not if there is exemption from the provisions of the Passengers Act it must be on some other ground - nor to issue a Proclamation fixing Hongkong and Singapore at less than 7 days or rather to revoke the Proclamation which fixes it at more - because the repeal of a particular company have on average done it in less, would I think be wrong in principle and unsafe in practice. The exemption could not be confined to the P. & O Company's Boats, & how could security be taken that other Steamers put on the line should be of equal speed with theirs. More;
8. ...
However, to follow the exact output format as requested (HTML usingfor paragraphs), and adhering strictly to the given instructions without directly referencing them:
Mong dans
N30 No. 2673
Governor No.
unedy 30
Date
1873 Feby 11
Last previous Paper.
1626
(Subject.)
DESPATCH.
RECEIVED
Chinese Passengers' Act 1855:
Transmits Return
of
20 MAR 1873
of length of Voyages of Steamers running
between Hong Kong & Singapore
(Minutes.)
K
191
7. The question raised by Me Mi Svers Witter is whether the fact that the P.&O. Boats make the voyage between Hong Kong & Singapore in less than seven days on an average ought to exempt them from the provisions of the Passengers Act - I am clearly of opinion that it ought not if there is exemption from the provisions of the Passengers Act it must be on some other ground - nor to issue a Proclamation fixing Hongkong and Singapore at less than 7 days or rather to revoke the Proclamation which fixes it at more - because the repeal of a particular company have on average done it in less, would I think be wrong in principle and unsafe in practice. The exemption could not be confined to the P.&O. Company's Boats, & how could security be taken that other Steamers put on the line should be of equal speed with theirs. More;
1
...
has been revised toMong dans
N30 No. 2673
Governor No.
July 30
Date
1873 Feby 11
Last previous Paper.
1626
(Subject.)
DESPATCH.
RECEIVED
Chinese Passengers' Act 1855:
Transmits Return
of
20 MAR 1873
of length of Voyages of Steamers running
between Hong Kong & Singapore
(Minutes.)
K
191
7. The question raised by Mr. Messrs Witter is whether the fact that the P.&O. Boats make the voyage between Hong Kong & Singapore in less than seven days on an average ought to exempt them from the provisions of the Passengers Act - I am clearly of opinion that it ought not if there is exemption from the provisions of the Passengers Act it must be on some other ground - nor to issue a Proclamation fixing Hongkong and Singapore at less than 7 days or rather to revoke the Proclamation which fixes it at more - because the repeal of a particular company have on average done it in less, would I think be wrong in principle and unsafe in practice. The exemption could not be confined to the P.&O. Company's Boats, & how could security be taken that other Steamers put on the line should be of equal speed with theirs. More;
8. ...
is not needed as the original text has "8." followed by "1" which seems to be the start of the next paragraph or item, hence it is kept as is in the revised response. Here is the final output:Mong dans
N30 No. 2673
Governor No.
July 30
Date
1873 Feby 11
Last previous Paper.
1626
(Subject.)
DESPATCH.
RECEIVED
Chinese Passengers' Act 1855:
Transmits Return
of
20 MAR 1873
of length of Voyages of Steamers running
between Hong Kong & Singapore
(Minutes.)
K
191
7. The question raised by Mr. Messrs Witter is whether the fact that the P.&O. Boats make the voyage between Hong Kong & Singapore in less than seven days on an average ought to exempt them from the provisions of the Passengers Act - I am clearly of opinion that it ought not if there is exemption from the provisions of the Passengers Act it must be on some other ground - nor to issue a Proclamation fixing Hongkong and Singapore at less than 7 days or rather to revoke the Proclamation which fixes it at more - because the repeal of a particular company have on average done it in less, would I think be wrong in principle and unsafe in practice. The exemption could not be confined to the P.&O. Company's Boats, & how could security be taken that other Steamers put on the line should be of equal speed with theirs. More;
1
Mong trong
N30No 2673
Governor No.
unedy 30
Date
1873 Feby 11
Last previous Paper.
1626
(Subject.)
DESPATCH.
RECEIVE
Chinese Passengers' Act 1855:
Transmits Return
bryapes of
20 MAR 1873
of
of length Pand & Steamers rumming
between Hong Kong & Singapore
(Minutes.)
K
191
7. The question raised by Me Mi Svers Witter is whether the fact that the Dr.O. Boats make.
between It Kong & Singapore
in less
& the voyage
Referred Wor. CM 11 March
Tons March
29
203738
(6000 3 | 72-H & S 6759)
on an average
ought to rerrupt
of the basengers
disin
than seven days
from the provisione
Act - Dam clearly of pinion are to be comple
that it ought not if there
from the provisions of the Dafingere Act it
must be on some
other ground - por to issue
the voyage
abroclamation piging Hongkong and Singapore,
behoren
at left than 7 days
ox rather to revoke the Proclamation which
fixes it at more _ because the repeals of or particular company.
have on on average done it in less, would I think be corong principle and unsafe in practice. The sxemption could not be confined to the P. R
8. Companys Boult, & how could security. be taken that other Steamers put on the line should be of equal fired with theirs. More;
1
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.